|
|
(1 - 4) |
(5 - 6) |
(7 - 8) |
(9 - 10) |
|
|
|
|
-not organized, theories make no sense
-no introduction and/or conclusion |
-some organization
-theories jump around and are confusing -start and end are unclear |
-organized
-theories are somewhat jumpy |
-good organization
-theories are logically ordered -sharp sense of beginning/end |
x .5 | |
|
Content |
-unable to find specific details
-no references or work cited -no diagrams |
-details and understanding are somewhat sketchy
-references or work citied is incomplete -analysis is weak -few diagrams, poorly labeled |
-some details are non - supporting to the subject
-work cited and references are evident -understanding of the topic is a bit fussy -diagrams are somewhat confusing |
-supporting details specific to subject
-work cited/ references are present/correct -demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic -good use of diagrams |
x 2 | |
|
|
-very frequent grammar and/or spelling errors
-no evidence of MLA format |
-more than two errors
-not correct MLA format |
-only one or two errors
-MLA format used |
-all grammar and spelling correct | x .3 | |
|
Research |
-needs descriptive words
-from one source |
-vocabulary is constant
-details lack colour -uses few sources |
-vocabulary is varied
-supporting details need work -more than two sources |
-vocabulary varied
-supporting details are varied -more than two sources |
x 1 | |
|
|
-not word processed
-disorganized -loose pages |
-titles and subtitles are inconsistent
-no illustrations |
-clean and neat
-illustrations included -some minor confusion |
-well typed and organized
-clean and neat -illustrations -flows very well |
x .3 | |
|
|
-more than one week late | -up to one week late | -up to two days late | -handed in on time | x .3 |
TOTAL OUT OF 44:
NOTES:
1. Organization